Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:02:07 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /proc/uptime etc. - NtQuerySystemInformation() needs bigger structure Message-ID: <20020705200207.GA11696@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <004f01c22449$91da71a0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004f01c22449$91da71a0$0100a8c0@advent02> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Chris January wrote: >> --- winsup/cygwin/ntdll.h.old 2002-05-30 21:21:04.000000000 +0100 >> +++ winsup/cygwin/ntdll.h 2002-07-05 11:15:52.000000000 +0100 >> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ typedef struct _SYSTEM_PROCESSOR_TIMES >> LARGE_INTEGER DpcTime; >> LARGE_INTEGER InterruptTime; >> ULONG InterruptCount; >> + ULONG Unused; >> } SYSTEM_PROCESSOR_TIMES, *PSYSTEM_PROCESSOR_TIMES; >> >> typedef LONG KPRIORITY; > >I will look at this patch tonight, but I would be grateful if you could >answer the following questions: >What version of binutils are you using? >If you compiled Cygwin using just the 1.3.12 sources with no modifications, >does /proc/uptime have any content? I think this is a symptom of the fact that gcc uses different alignment than msvc. If you add a __attribute__ ((aligned (8))) to the structure it should "fix" the problem. This is one thing that was fixed by the -fnative-struct gcc option which is, unfortunately, not available in gcc 3.1. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/