Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020702203255.02643eb0@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:37:57 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: SUBJECT .... In-Reply-To: <20020703032235.GA19840@redhat.com> References: <200207030304 DOT UAA04295 AT sumeru DOT stanford DOT EDU> <200207030304 DOT UAA04295 AT sumeru DOT stanford DOT EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Chris, Whew! Thanks for that unequivocal reply. There's nothing worse (in the world of mailing lists) that such a hideous sop to brain-dead mailers. This makes me suspect that we're about due for the counterpart to the request for a [LIST-NAME] "Subject:" tag: having "Reply-To:" set by the list server. Perhaps that one should be put to rest, right away, too? Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 20:22 2002-07-02, you wrote: >On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:04:41PM -0700, Dennis Allison wrote: > >For a high volume list like this, it's useful to have the subject > >header tagged so dumb mail filtering can be used. Any chance we can > >get the mailing list admin to arrange it to be added? > >Nope. Absolutely no chance whatsoever. Zero. Nada. Zilch. No way. >Ain't going to happen. > >There are any number of ways to filter on stuff in the header that don't >require adding the annoying subject prefixes. > >In case it isn't clear, I don't like the subject prefixes... > >cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/