Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 22:40:45 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: The road to 1.3.11 -- please try the latest snapshot Message-ID: <20020602024045.GA2682@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020530032207 DOT GA29644 AT redhat DOT com> <07b401c209bb$5a2195c0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <00fd01c209c9$c9250c00$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020602020456 DOT GB7937 AT redhat DOT com> <015801c209dd$d16c18e0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <015801c209dd$d16c18e0$6132bc3e@BABEL> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 03:33:02AM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: >One thing that seems reasonably clear (and maybe you've just fixed this), is >that XEmacs seems to think that any non-existent file inside the /proc/ >directories is itself a directory. (How it can think that of a non-existent >file I don't know.) So opening /proc//foo gives dired error messages >from XEmacs, i.e. it thinks that foo is a directory. Nope, I didn't fix this. You can see the same behavior with ls -l /proc//foo . I'll look into it. (Unless ChrisJ beats me to it) Thanks, cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/