Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 08:18:15 +0100 Message-ID: <7344-Fri17May2002081815+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Jim George" Cc: "Cygwin" Subject: two installs one works; one doesn't In-Reply-To: <00ae01c1fd1c$72a0b190$23b5fea9@GEORGE.CO.UK> References: <00ae01c1fd1c$72a0b190$23b5fea9 AT GEORGE DOT CO DOT UK> On Thursday 16 May 02, Jim George writes: > I have cygwin, cygwin-xfree, and postgres installed on two Win2K systems. > The first is a W2K Professional on a Toshiba Laptop, the second is a W2K > Advanced Server on a desktop. > > The first works like grease lightening, the second runs like a dog in xfree > and postgres (indeed I can't even run initDB). Both have the same anti-virus software setup? I notice massive performance differences depending on which product I use and how it's configured. David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/