Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CC59B0F.9F3CED79@f4z.org> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:34:07 +0200 From: Adrian Prantl X-Accept-Language: en,de-AT MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: hmmm possible gpl problem? References: <3CC51A1F DOT 7040908 AT goingware DOT com> <3CC54679 DOT FE036A82 AT cern DOT ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gareth Pearce wrote: > okay - i dont claim to know anything much about gpl ... > but - http://www.tux.org/pub/security/secnet/tools/nat10/ > (which is the only place I found it in a quick google search) > distributes a gpl program linked against cygwin.dll (note not cygwin1.dll) > without cygwin source. > > Going on past emails, this looks faulty, but thought i would post it here > for > someone with more experience in such matters to comment. > > Regards, > Gareth Pearce I really don't think that it would be appropriate to start a fox hunt for everyone that could be violating the gpl in this or the other minor way. As long as the reason is not a commercial exploit, I believe that too much cautions would result in a harm to the free software community. I believe that a too strict prosecution of the rules would not encourage people to release there works to the public. btw I think the GPL only states that the sources should be made available if someone asks for them, so it would be ok to distribute the program in binary form and send the source per email if requested. (please correct me if I am wrong) regards, adrian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/