Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <003101c1a98e$100ca980$ce113e9b@LSIL.COM> From: "Phil Dempster" To: Subject: Re: ntsec+inetd+cvspserver (was CVS PServer problem) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:59:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > Heck, why did I wrote /usr/doc/inetutils-1.3.2.README and what are > the announcements good for? Since version 1.3.2-15 we have the > following (quoted): [snip] Apologies and thanks... So: Since CVS is evidently running as Guest (there are no entries in the event log to contradict this) and the user account specified in CVSROOT/passwd is also Guest, how can it be that CVS is able to modify read-only admin files whose ownership is Administrator:Administrators? For example, the `modules' file has the properties: -r--r--r-- 1 Administ Administ 1170 Jan 30 10:29 modules After I check it out, modify it, then commit it: -r--r--r-- 1 Guest Administ 1186 Jan 30 12:51 modules Am I missing something really obvious? The fact that the group remains `Administrators' rings alarm bells. I'm just trying to get a better understanding of what's going on here as I only have a rudimentary knowledge of Win2K and Unix file permissions. Cheers, Phil -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/