Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C3EDDAD.275EE044@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:42:21 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CU List Subject: Re: Compiling apps to Mingw32 with cygwin References: <3C3EDCA7 DOT C40E3CD6 AT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: Re: Compiling apps to Mingw32 with cygwin > Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:25:17 +1100 > From: "Robert Collins" > To: "Jon Leichter" > CC: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jon Leichter" > > > See above why it doesn't. mingw != cygwin :}. > > > > If 'build' WERE to be tested automatically, independent to 'host', it > would > > come up with 'i686-pc-cygwin'. Thus, we'd effectively end up with the > same > > line you specified above. So that does work, right? Or are you trying > to > > confuse me again??? :) > > What doesn't kill us makes us stronger. IF build were tested correctly > yes. But it's not currently tested - it defaults to host IFF host is > defined. > This rule is changed for 2.50 and greater. Build no longer takes on the value of host and you're warned about this when specifying --host without specifying --build. IIRC, if you specify build without host then host takes on the value of build but I may be wrong on this point. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/