Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de>
To: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:09:02 +0100
Message-ID: <003101c19375$80ca1ab0$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To: <20020102110451.F27340@cygbert.vinschen.de>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf
> Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:05 AM
> To: Cygwin
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:57:25AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> > Thanks for this hints. While porting kdelibs I have had to explicity closed and
> delete the
> > socket file before I can bound to it (which wasn't used under other ported os)
> and as I found
> > the decribed code in the bind() function, the first thoughts was that this may be the
> > problem. After this correction I will look at the kde code to identify the
> called functions.
> > Perhaps the problem is the getsockname().
>
> I have checked in a fix to getsockname() to return the correct result
> for AF_LOCAL/AF_UNIX sockets as well.  You can find it in the current
> sources from CVS.
>
> > After looking in the code I have an additional question. Does cygwin and linux
> differs in the
> > possibilites of deleting of open files ? This could be a difference, because I have found
> > that before binding an unlink() is made, but fails.
>
> The usual Win32/Posix difference:  You can't unlink a file on Win32
> which is still in use.

That's it. Thanks

> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/