Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: A bug (?) in the current setup.exe 2.78.2.15 From: Robert Collins To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20011102193259.A31762@redhat.com> References: <001201c163a7$5d1610e0$6fc82486 AT medschool DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk> <3BE2E375 DOT EB32B4E4 AT syntrex DOT com> <1004744797 DOT 9054 DOT 65 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011102193259 DOT A31762 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Nov 2001 12:26:19 +1100 Message-Id: <1004750780.521.28.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2001 01:30:37.0665 (UTC) FILETIME=[241F1510:01C16407] On Sat, 2001-11-03 at 11:32, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:58:51AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >There is a longer discussion we can have, about package versions, > >sequence holes and trust levels, but I need to assemble some thoughts > >first. > > FWIW, I have a patch which makes this slightly better, I think, but > it shouldn't be extremely hard to do the right thing in scan2. Please drop me the patch, it may save some time.. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/