Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:29:56 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Remove cygwin "History" from FAQ?
Message-ID: <20011015212956.B12545@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4956-Mon15Oct2001225801+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <3BCB7C21 DOT 1000509 AT punkpage DOT net> <7777-Mon15Oct2001235619+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <3BCB85DF DOT 4070504 AT punkpage DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3BCB85DF.4070504@punkpage.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:57:03AM +0200, Punk Page Peter wrote:
>>The release announcements provide the current history. These are indexed
>>in the Project News page <http://cygwin.com/news.html>.
>
>Good. Only it's not news anymore, it's history. Perhaps the history 
>could/should have a 'news history'-section?

Not interested.   Sorry.

(This is pretty much my guaranteed reaction to the word "perhaps")

Also, since there was not a general hue and cry when I eliminated the
history.html link, I don't think that there is much interest in an
out-of-date, sketchy, unmaintained bunch of words whose most recent
mention is the B20 release.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/