Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:39:12 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Patch: Bug: Shell fork/exec avoidance in make-3.79.1-3 Message-ID: <20010627113912.A22088@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E2D0 AT IIS000> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E2D0@IIS000>; from Dautrevaux@microprocess.com on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:28:42AM +0200 On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:28:42AM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote: >In fact that shows a small problem with the 'patch' level of tools: there is >no way when you look at the source code or at the executable to know which >patch level you are using: both say 3.79.1, with no patch level ;-( With the >installed tool, you can look in the update.db file, but for the source... The name of the directory in the make sources is make-3.79.1-3 or make-3.79.1-2. If that is not an adequate hint about the patch level of sources that you are working on, then I'm not sure how things could be made clearer. Maybe we can stop talking about this now? The bug has been tracked down and eliminated by a valiant net contributor. I've released a new version of make. Let's move on. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/