Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:02:40 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin with sockscap32
Message-ID: <20010224190240.I6893@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200102222041 DOT f1MKfKj29110 AT quickmonkey DOT com> <20010224164002 DOT B6385 AT redhat DOT com> <200102242149 DOT f1OLns802613 AT quickmonkey DOT com> <20010224175137 DOT A6846 AT redhat DOT com> <3A9844BC DOT 7485D813 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3A9844BC.7485D813@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:33:16PM -0500

On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:33:16PM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Chris Faylor wrote:
>>However, the only way the problem is going to be narrowed down is if
>>you, or someone, debugs sockscap.  The sources *must* be available
>>given Cygwin's licensing agreement.
>
>Not really -- see my other message.  Sockscap doesn't link or use
>cygwin itself -- it modifies the networking layer of the machine on
>which it is installed.  Actually, that means that on MADHU's machine,
>*cygwin* is using *sockscap*, not the other way around.  So cygwin's
>license doesn't apply.

Yeah, your message crossed mine.  Thanks for doing the research.

I stand corrected.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple