Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: 13 Feb 2001 14:14:50 -0500 Message-ID: <20010213191450.15506.qmail@lizard.curl.com> From: jik-cygwin AT curl DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-reply-to: <3A89867C.395FC4E3@yahoo.com> (message from Earnie Boyd on Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:09:48 -0500) Subject: Re: Optimizing away "ReadFile" calls when Make calls stat() References: <20010213183634 DOT 1435 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <3A89867C DOT 395FC4E3 AT yahoo DOT com> > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:09:48 -0500 > From: Earnie Boyd > > This sounds very interesting but I believe work to eliminate TWO > ReadFiles would be best; but, I don't know if this is possible. I don't understand what you mean. The experiment I did yesterday *did* eliminate both ReadFiles. However, I don't think Make can eliminate both ReadFiles *by default* because Make can't assume that the user doesn't use any symlinks unless the user tells it to assume that. > I have found the following set of GCC flags to have great impact > with the speed with wish Cygwin flies. How gcc should be called when compiling Cygwin is an interesting question, but it's not the one I'm asking here. I hope the people from RedHat who compile the Cygwin packages that go up on the Web sites consider your suggestion, though :-). jik -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple