Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3A0B7DD7.B295D300@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 23:47:19 -0500 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: Can not found crt1.o when using -mno-cygwin option References: <002101c04a1d$60ae0c20$de90718c AT cm DOT nctu DOT edu DOT tw> <3A0AE178 DOT 7FF31F35 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20001109232939 DOT A6759 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:40:08PM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote: > >There seem to be a few mistakes in the specs file; the following seems > >to work (however, the "right" fix is somewhere in the bowels of the gcc > >source code, so that the specs file is *generated* to look like this). > > > >#1) The specs file is using the wrong version number > > I don't know how this matters. This version isn't reported by gcc and > it obviously isn't used for getting the specs file. I have, however, > updated my script to deal with this. The problem is that the specs file > is generated by the compiler building gcc rather than gcc itself when > building gcc as a cross-compile. That's what I do. It probably doesn't matter. I just noticed it because "gcc -v" showed "version 2.95.2-3" and I knew that was wrong. Then, I saw it in the spec file while tracking down the libmingw thing. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com