Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "John Pollock" To: "DJ Delorie" Cc: Subject: RE: setup.exe incorrectly identifies build versions? Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:14:23 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200010172129.RAA14688@envy.delorie.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal >The "new GUI setup program" doesn't use the registry to remember >what's installed. It also doesn't expand version numbers like that; >it would refer to it as bash-2.4.2. Sorry, i was giving the version numbers as they appear in the registry, but if the new setup keeps track of installed components in a db file, this obviously wouldn't be the place to look to see what's installed. So the newer setup.exe keeps its info in /etc/setup/installed.db? /etc/setup doesn't exist on this machine that i just ran the new setup.exe on, although /etc obviously does. I'll try again with the newer setup on a clean machine and see if i can reproduce the problem. The reason i've been avoiding the newer setup is that it doesn't appear to accept any command-line parameters, meaning i can't invoke it remotely; i have to be at the console. Are there hidden switches i don't know about, or is this accurate? Thanks much! John -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com