Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:36:24 -0400
To: "Cygwin Mailing List (E-mail)" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: Two snapshot bugs
Message-ID: <20001011153624.B12484@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: "Cygwin Mailing List (E-mail)" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <002001c033b2$5f06cb90$1d01a8c0 AT BRAEMARINC DOT COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <002001c033b2$5f06cb90$1d01a8c0@BRAEMARINC.COM>; from tiberius@braemarinc.com on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 01:37:54PM -0500

On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 01:37:54PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>cgf wrote:
>
>> How long does it take before bash exits?  Can you get it to exit in
>> 20 repetitions of something simple like /bin/pwd?
>
>Right now I'm using the 10/10 snapshot.  I cannot get it to logout after
>over a hundred pwd's, or ls's for that matter.  But it did 'auto-logout' on
>me about a half hour ago, when I ran notepad from the bash prompt.  Running
>notepad now several times did not cause any logouts.
>
>One of them real fun ones, huh? ;-(

Oh yeah, this is really fun.  The fact that it has improved in 10/8
should be a clue but so far I'm to dense to figure out the clue.

Anyway, I'd be deliriously happy if I could see it fail even once.

>Haven't done enough yet today to tell if the '100% usage' thing is still
>there.  It was pretty bad in the 10/8 snapshot.  I'm going to try a
>cross-compile of GCC which is sure to make it show up if it's still there...

I don't expect it to have changed in the 10/10 snapshot unless Corinna's
changes did something, which is doubtful since she wasn't trying to fix
this problem.

Corinna sent me a gdb trace of a process in this state but it wasn't
useful, unfortunately.

I'm thinking of buying a new computer to test this.  Mine are obviously
charmed.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com