Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: "Dan Haynes" <haynes AT anchorgaming DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: RE: A dumb CR/LF question
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:09:18 -0600
Message-ID: <027601c0314a$7e30c440$0600000a@tired>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-reply-to: <20001007222523.A31805@cygnus.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4

Today's snapshot fixes the CR CR LF problem - the files now get CR LF line
endings as expected. Thank you!

Unfortunately I get the same apparently random exit problems I was
experiencing with the 9/29 snapshot. If I use the version of cygwin1.dll as
distributed, the scripts always run to completion. With the 9/29 and 10/8
snapshots, sometimes the scripts run to completion, most of the time they
just exit at a random point. If I try to redirect output I get either just a
part of the expected output text or sometimes nothing at all in the file -
however when output is redirected (using either '>goo' or '>goo 2>&1') I
never get the exit problem!?

I need to do two things - I need to go back and verify my environment works
properly using the bash test scripts because I also seem to have a problem
executing valid scripts if I don't use '.', and I also need to come up
something *slightly* more definitive than 'it randomly exits'. I'll see if I
can reduce it to something repeatable.

I'll do what I can, but I'm almost out of time that I can afford to spend on
this experiment. I wanted to see how much effort it would take to port my
build procedure, and the answer seems to be "a lot". :-\

Thanks again for the quick help and the quick bug fix!

Regards,

  Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Chris Faylor
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 8:25 PM
> To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
> Subject: Re: A dumb CR/LF question
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:19:08PM -0600, Dan Haynes wrote:
> >Will do - you mean the 10/6 snapshot? That's the most recent one I see up
> >there.
>
> No.  The next one.  I just fixed this today.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com