Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 23:30:56 -0400 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: binutils-20000625 and --enable-auto-image-base Message-ID: <20000704233056.A3973@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <39629555 DOT D74ABFDD AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200007050153 DOT VAA03219 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3962989F DOT B1FAB50E AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20000704220656 DOT A3751 AT cygnus DOT com> <3962A0EF DOT 5CF9AAEB AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3962A0EF.5CF9AAEB@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 10:43:59PM -0400 On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 10:43:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Chris Faylor wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 10:08:31PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >Well, he seems to have submitted it to the main binutils list >> >(http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/binutils/1999-q3/msg00538.html). But, I >> >can't seem to find any evidence that it was actually committed in the >> >main binutils. >> > >> >Is it possible to include Mumit's patch, and the one posted by Eric >> >Fifer a few days ago, and release another version of cygwin-binutils (or >> >push those two patches into the main binutils, since you're releasing >> >out of sourceware)? I will try to sync up Mumit's patch with the >> >20000625 source code tonight... >> >> It's possible. Maybe DJ will even be able to commit Mumit's change. >> >> I don't know what Eric Fifer's change was but if it is the dllwrap >> fix, it's already in cvs. > >Yes, you are correct. I just checked the cvsweb interface and Eric's >change had been committed. > >The binutils-20000625-src.tar.gz is not *strictly* a pure >out-of-sourceware release. The cvs shows that only the first part of my >changes to emultempl/pe.em are there, but all of my changes to that file >appear in the cygwin-specific tarball. That's right. I added your changes after I noticed that not all had been applied. >The workaround, of course, is to fix the dlltool command so that the >import lib is called 'libperl5_6_0.dll.a'. We can deal with these issues >in the cygwin community, but I don't think it's a good idea to >inconvenience the rest of the pei386 folks with these most recent >changes just yet. Is there any reason why 'ld' can't import data from the DLL? Wouldn't that fix this problem? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com