Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:30:12 -0400 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: New GCC available for testing (TRY 3) -- fixes -mno-cygwin problem Message-ID: <20000616173012.A10540@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000616131828 DOT A17545 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from bkeener@thesoftwaresource.com on Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 04:37:40PM -0400 On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 04:37:40PM -0400, Brian Keener wrote: >Update my previous post - > >using gcc on a simple Hello World (as shown in Mumit Khan's document: >mno-cygwin-howto) works with your latest update on a .c file with an >without -mno-cygwin and shows the correct DLL's being used and execute >properly. Using c++ or gcc on a .cc file works without the -mno-cygwin >option and fails with -mno-cygwin option. Come on! What does "fails" mean??? I am not psychic. Btw, I am not interested in any other specs files than the one that I released. I'm obviously putting effort into getting something working with the cygwin distribution. I'm not volunteering to work on mingw. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com