Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:13:21 -0400
To: "'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: Weird behavior when using "-I" with gcc-2.95.2
Message-ID: <20000427141321.B1434@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com,
	"'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
References: <7B4C28C84831D211BFA200805F9F34567030F7 AT nswcdlvaex04 DOT nswc DOT navy DOT mil> <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1000427130557 DOT 19541A-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1000427130557.19541A-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:09:45PM -0500

On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:09:45PM -0500, Mumit Khan wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Fontenot Larry A DLVA wrote:
>> Well that was very interesting.  Everything compiles just fine on the local
>> hard disk when using the "-I ./".  So then I tried my H:\ drive.  That is a
>> drive I have mapped from a WinNT server.  Once again, everything works just
>> fine.  So then I went to my I:\ drive, which is a Sun Solaris file server
>> using SunLink software to emulate a WinNT server.  That is when I start
>> having problems.  Apparently, gcc is seeing something differently when
>> compiling on my I:\ drive.  Should I try to use strace at this point to find
>> out what the difference might be?
>
>Normally I'd blame inode generation on remote drives, but that's not it
>since I've turned off inode based path lookup optimization in gcc.
>
>It does look like a problem with Cygwin interaction with SunLink (I know
>nothing of this software). Now that we know where the problem lies, we
>should try to isolate it by writing the shortest possible testcase. Maybe
>a problem with `stat' on SunLink server?
>
>I suppose the strace output may be a good place to start. It's going to be
>large, so do compress the output using gzip before posting. Hopefully the
>Cygwin gurus can take over and solve this mystery.

Can we at least try the latest snapshot first?

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com