Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <38DBB0E3.A0322DF4@vinschen.de> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 19:16:03 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen Reply-To: cygwin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin Subject: Re: about the id -Gn References: <38DB89A2 DOT 131CADE1 AT cnen DOT de DOT edf DOT fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frederic Lorrain wrote: > > We found difficulties using the bash command "Id -Gn" on NT box. > > We did not want to use only primary groups and so we first created > several groups. We added users in many groups in file c:\etc\group. > > In spite of this modification, result of command "Id -Gn" still displays > the primary group. > > Did we make an error ? Is it possible to use many groups for users in > cygnus bash NT ? Neither with b20.1 nor with 1.0 But it's already possible with the developer snapshots and so it will be possible in the next net release (1.1.0), too. Please note that the _real_ security settings are managed by NT/W2K. The insertion of supplementary groups in /etc/groups is only a help/hint for you. There's no command `newgroup' and there's no need for it in NT/W2K. Corinna -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com