Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:46:24 -0600 (CST) From: Mumit Khan To: N8TM AT aol DOT com cc: kris DOT thielemans AT csc DOT mrc DOT ac DOT uk, anorland AT hem DOT passagen DOT se, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: LARGE_INTEGER in w32API 0.1.5 In-Reply-To: <5b.1341403.25c2f83d@aol.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 N8TM AT aol DOT com wrote: > When this has been sorted out, the gcc distribution of > libf2c/libU77/[de]time_.c needs the corresponding fix. Will there be 3 > commonly distributed variations in LARGE_INTEGER? > My local tree has the fix. The next w32api snapshot from my site will default to _ANONYMOUS_UNION and _ANONYMOUS_STRUCT and unfortunately that will create a few transient problems. But we need to look at the future, and do it right before it's too late (ie., before it breaks too many code that uses the .u hack for lack of anon struct/union support). Note that my recent changes to w32api (will be in the snapshot this weekend and hopefully in Cygwin's next net release) will only turn on this feature if the compiler supports it. Regards, Mumit -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com