Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <387F5E9E.FF43BF9F@vinschen.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 18:36:30 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: de,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andre Oliveira da Costa <costa AT cade DOT com DOT br>
CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable name 
 (a.exe now)
References: <001901bf5df6$428a2170$8400000a AT costa DOT cadenet DOT com DOT br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andre Oliveira da Costa wrote:
> [...]
> I don't think tweaking all these applications to look for "foo.exe" if they
> can't find "foo" would be the right thing. But I would really like to be
> able to install the applications I compile without having to tweak all the
> makefiles. Maybe the solution would be not to add the .exe suffix...

I agree. It would be nice if gcc would not add .exe automatically.
Maybe it's not a 'modern' solution but it's the way, cc produces
executables since french revolution:

	No output name given: 	a.out is created,
	-o foo:			foo is created.

That's it and it's ok.
IMHO.
Corinna

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com