Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <20000113202630.19220.qmail@web124.yahoomail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:26:30 -0800 (PST) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: RE: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable na me (a.exe now) To: Andre Oliveira da Costa , cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Andre Oliveira da Costa wrote: > Mmmh... ok, I agree this would solve the problem for packages which use > autoconf/automake. But those who don't are still in the dark. The worst of > it all is that the .exe suffix is added by ld -- it is as if cygwin creates > problems for itself... > > (before flaming starts: I know there's a very good reason for the insertion > of the .exe suffix: it has to be added so that the files can be seen as > executables by Windoze -- another great feature (?) by M$oft... =T As I > said, I just think it would be nice to have this .exe suffix handled > transparently, since it is automagically created) > I agree, Andre. I suggested, years ago now, that the .exe suffix be an optional configuration whose default is off. It isn't needed by the Bourne shells we use to execute the programs. I would like to see this as optional with say a GCC_SUFFIX=.exe environment variable. If GCC_SUFFIX exists it uses the value to append to the executable output file. ===== Earnie Boyd Cygwin Newbies, please visit __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com