Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: N8TM AT aol DOT com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 01:23:10 EST Subject: Re: [mingw32] [RFC] changing gcc default output executable name (a.exe now) To: mingw32 AT egroups DOT com CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 12 In a message dated 1/12/2000 9:30:18 PM Pacific Standard Time, Brent DOT Williams AT wcom DOT com writes: > Given > your example, will it write over any existing foo1.exe file? Yes, for the compilers I've used. I don't find that so much of a problem, but I do see those compilers using a lot more disk space, with so many different named statically linked .exe files to forget to clean up. Tim tprince AT computer DOT org -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com