Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:38:56 -0500
To: john AT thinman DOT com
Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Redhat, Cygwin, Just curious...
Message-ID: <20000110193856.A29701@cygnus.com>
Mail-Followup-To: john AT thinman DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <20000110220635 DOT 14206 DOT qmail AT web803 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <20000110220635.14206.qmail@web803.mail.yahoo.com>; from john_van_v@yahoo.com on Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 02:06:35PM -0800

On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 02:06:35PM -0800, John van V. wrote:
>>-Chris Faylor
>>-Cygwin Programming Manager
>>-Red Hat
>
>What is the naming convention since cygnus got loaded in redhat?
>
>My guess was to see cygnus stay under its own banner in a near-pure
>science mode, whereas redhat is really more into integration....  but
>then bell-labs got siphoned directly into lucent.  Not that it really
>matters...

I'm sure that I can't officially speak for Red Hat (btw, notice that it
is two words, both capitalized) but AFAIK your guess is not correct.

I'm a Red Hat employee now, not a Cygnus employee.  Cygnus employees
will pretty much continue to do what it did only moreso and under the
Red Hat banner.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com