Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:45:52 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin poll Message-ID: <20000110134552.A18991@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000110093801 DOT 50715 DOT qmail AT hotmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000110093801.50715.qmail@hotmail.com>; from ealiberti@hotmail.com on Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 10:38:01AM +0100 On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 10:38:01AM +0100, Emanuele Aliberti wrote: >Andre Oliveira da Costa wrote: > >>I created a zero-length file named "aux" in the POSIX subsystem >[omissis] >>This seems like a bug in Windows Explorer, but we can't prevent it >>without avoiding reserved names completely, so that'd be my >>recommendation. > >Win32 applications access devices via symbolic links in the executive >namespace (at least under NT), idem PSX applications. As DJ mentioned in his original mail the method that he proposed WON'T WORK WITH NORMAL WINDOWS TOOLS. If someone doesn't consider Windows Explorer to be a normal Windows tool, then I am mystified as to what they think would fall into this category. Since there is so much inexplicable confusion regarding this issue, I guess we have to consider any votes issued null-and-void. It's obvious that many people had no idea what they were voting for. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com