Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: jrson AT az DOT freei DOT net (Mikey) To: Paul Sokolovsky Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Re[2]: ANNOUNCE selfhosting mingw32 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 01:36:01 GMT Organization: Never Reply-To: jrson AT az DOT freei DOT net Message-ID: <386085cc.100238993@mail.az.freei.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > And now the main question: what is _your_ licensing for the stuff? >Mingw32 is in public domain, if - let my imagination run away with - >you wouldn't impose too much additional restrictions, then: You can't pose additional restrictions on L/GPL software. It would be against the copyleft. My patches are in the public domain, anyone can use them for any purpose. Once my patches are combined with the L/GPL source the aggregate program is L/GPL, at least that is what the L/GPL says, no one can change the L/GPL status of a program. > > > > Hey, folks, new Posix-on-Win32 implementation > emerges, not plagued with GPLedness!!! There is nothing wrong with GPL'edness, I just choose not to assign an unneeded, extra copywrite, to Cygnus, or the FSF, when the L/GPL already specifically handles the situation. If the L/GPL can't stand on it's own merits, many programmers have made a mistake in their copywrite decisions.-) > > >Best regards, > Paul mailto:paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com