Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: N8TM AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <0.d76a415f.256bf3a8@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:42:00 EST
Subject: Re: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
To: skumar2 AT hotmail DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 44

In a message dated 11/22/99 11:29:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
skumar2 AT hotmail DOT com writes:

> On windows 95 the shell scripts are
>  considerably slow
I'm sure people will want more information than this; e.g. did you read the 
FAQ, which version of 95, did you install the Y2K patcher, and, if 
applicable, the USB add-on, and maybe the cygcheck output.

Tim
tprince AT computer DOT org

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com