Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Reply-To: <ssiddiqi AT nspm DOT ipass DOT net>
From: "Suhaib Siddiqi" <sssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: RE: Red Hat Buys Cygnus
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 16:12:47 -0500
Message-ID: <NDBBLHPPKKBKPBLLMFJBEEOACEAA.sssiddiqi@ipass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <19991115152517.A8144@cygnus.com>


This means
Cygnus will become Red Hat Cygnus?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of 
> Chris Faylor
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 3:25 PM
> To: Cygwin Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Red Hat Buys Cygnus
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 11:04:43AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 09:32:12AM -0500, Nick Codignotto wrote:
> >>http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/bursts/0,7407,2393997-
> 1,00.html
> >
> >It does look official, doesn't it?  I'll post whatever 
> information I'm
> >allowed to disclose as soon as I know anything.
> 
> Ok.  Most, if not all, of the official answers to the 
> questions on the
> Cygnus/Redhat merger are off the Cygnus home page:  
> http://www.cygnus.com .
> There are two links which discuss the merger.
> 
> AFAICT, this is good news.  There is absolutely no reason 
> to think that
> this impacts cygwin in any negative way.  It is actually 
> possible that
> cygwin was considered an asset in the negotiations.
> 
> But, please, don't quote me.  :-)
> 
> -Chris Faylor
> -Cygwin Engineering Manager
> -Cygnus Solutions
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com