Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <38298ED9.688E4978@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 10:27:21 -0500 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: RedHat acquisition of Cygnus??? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit According to the following *RUMOR* posted on slashdot, http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/11/10/0823222, RedHat has inked a deal to acquire Cygnus. Now, I realize that, if true, Cygnus employees cannot comment. However, I'm not a Cygnus employee. I think this is a stupid move for both companies. Yeesh - what is it with corporations these days? Are acquisitions of other companies outside their core competency area the only way to grow? Is Cygnus looking at RedHat's vast market capitalization as a means of hiring enough lawyers to defend against MS' inevitable lawsuit (since MS will sue anyone who has a pulse and sells "platform" software)? What do you think? If the moderator considers this offtopic, then I apologize for posting it -- and please move discussion to the slashdot forum. However, I thought it was of interest to cygwin users. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com