Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <001a01beec92$076ee100$6400a8c0@olvi.org> From: "Michael V. Nikolaev" To: "Cygwin" Subject: Snapshots & GCC 2.95 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:31:47 +0300 Organization: Kiev T. Shevchenko University MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01BEECAB.10757B10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BEECAB.10757B10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have the following question: can I use GCC 2.95 to build latest = cygwin32 snapshots? And if so, should I overwrite afterwards libiberty, = mingw, and headers that has been built with Mumit Khan's GCC 2.95 stuff = (in gcc-2.95-cygb20.tar, gcc-2.95-mingw-extra.tar, and = gcc-2.95-dev.ss.tar)? Thank you, Best regards, Michael ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BEECAB.10757B10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I have the following question: can I use GCC 2.95 to build latest = cygwin32=20 snapshots? And if so, should I overwrite afterwards libiberty, mingw, = and=20 headers that has been built with Mumit Khan's GCC 2.95 stuff (in=20 gcc-2.95-cygb20.tar, gcc-2.95-mingw-extra.tar, and = gcc-2.95-dev.ss.tar)?

Thank you,

Best regards,

Michael

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BEECAB.10757B10--