Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Sender: root AT pluto DOT ipass DOT net Message-ID: <3749F727.CDDF63BB@ipass.net> Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 21:04:39 -0400 From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Peterson CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: /bin mount point and sh.exe References: <19990525005219 DOT 20273 DOT rocketmail AT web116 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark Peterson wrote: > > I have chosen the "identity mount" setup and mounted > This is the question: > At DOS with paths set up so that the H-i586-cygwin32/bin directory can > be found, should I be able > to simply type: > > sh ls If you have H-i586-cygwin32/bin in your DOS path sould be able to type ls (not sh ls) and get the results. > > and get a directory? As it is, sh cannot find ls in this way. Is this > bad syntax, or is this normal behavior? > > My mounts are down below. > > Thanks, > Mark > > c: / native > text!=binary > a: /a native > text!=binary > c:\cygnus\cygwin-b20\H-i586-cygwin32\bin /bin native > text!=binary > d: /d native > text!=binary > \\.\a: /dev/fd0 native > text!=binary > \\.\b: /dev/fd1 native > text!=binary > \\.\tape0: /dev/st0 native > text!=binary > \\.\tape1: /dev/st1 native > text!=binary > f: /f native > text!=binary > n: /n native > text!=binary > o: /o native > text!=binary > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com