Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com X-Mailer: 21.0 "20 minutes to Nikko" XEmacs Lucid (beta67) (via feedmail 8 I); VM 6.71 under 21.0 "20 minutes to Nikko" XEmacs Lucid (beta67) From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14143.9174.770000.534407@bryce.ebi.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 21:00:22 +0100 (GMT-0:00) To: Ian Zimmerman CC: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: install.exe and make install can't handle executables? In-Reply-To: <373B4303.C48958AE@lbin.com> References: <373B4303 DOT C48958AE AT lbin DOT com> On Thursday 13 May 99, Ian Zimmerman writes: > Hi, it looks like running "make install" pretty much on any GNU style > package will fail because the makefile rule passes "foo" as the filename > for install while the file that must be installed is "foo.exe". Note > that this _cannot_ be solved by telling "--program-suffix=.exe" to > configure, because that only changes the destination name, not the > source name. > > Is there any solution to this, or am I just out of luck and have to copy > files manually? The problem with this is not so much my laziness as the > fact that sometimes "make install" does other important things I don't > want to miss. Just replace install.exe with this one: Regards, David ------------------------------------------------------------------- David Starks-Browning | starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk EMBL Outstation -- | The European Bioinformatics Institute | Wellcome Trust Genome Campus | tel: +44 (1223) 494 616 Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK | fax: +44 (1223) 494 468 ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com