Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <001401be9b9d$eebbac00$29acdfd0@InspirePharm.Com>
From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
To: "Richard Hickling" <hicklinr AT mcd DOT alcatel DOT be>,
        "Bill Klein" <bill AT orbit DOT org>
Cc: <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>
References: <4.1.19990508183829.009f5bc0@> <4.1.19990510011632.009f7950@> <4.1.19990510142659.00b26d10@> <3737C8E2 DOT BF6B6E12 AT mcd DOT alcatel DOT be>
Subject: Re: DDD And Cygwin
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 07:03:42 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA22662



> > To follow up my previous post, I took your advice and tried
> > out the 30-day trial of Solstice to see how DDD would work,
> > but I have the same problem! As soon as I launch DDD, it eats
> > up 100% processor time constantly and consumes resources at
> > a very fast pace until the system is unusable (Windows NT 4,
> > SP5, 128MB RAM...). I guess you don't have this problem?
> 
> I should say that colleges using DDD on Sun SparcStation4s also
> complain of DDD being resource intensive.
> 

I checked it laswt night on Linux (RedHat 6.0).  It does the same thing, consumes 80-90%
of CPU resources.  Therefore, I conclude it is a bug in DDD source code, not in
Cygwin port of DDD.  On NT it does consume 80-90% CPU resources but system
does not become unusanle.

Suhaib


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com