From: vrice AT solidrocksystems DOT com (Vince Rice) Subject: Re: gcc can't find cpp 16 Jan 1999 17:17:59 -0800 Message-ID: <36A0C8D6.709040AF.cygnus.gnu-win32@solidrocksystems.com> References: <369B6573 DOT 2FD4AE50 AT solidrocksystems DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Geoffrey Noer Cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com > Hey, you callin' me a Martian? :-) Gieal igjfrsnik zlsie! > It's set up to cope with having a single tree that contains native and > cross-compilers for different hosts. Most people under Win32 don't > need this complex a structure which is why a fair number of people > complain about it. Well, all I would ask is how many of the people using Cygnus from the net are doing cross-compiling, different hosts, or even different versions of Cygnus on the same machine? I know there ARE some, I suspect they're the vast minority. > That said, it's possible we should change the structure for the Net > distributions. We'll think about it... That would be AWESOME!!! By moving around directories, I managed to get something approaching a "normal" directory strucutre, i.e. underneath g:\cygnus is /bin /etc /u /usr /usr/bin /usr/css /usr/etc /usr/include /usr/lib /usr/libexec /usr/local /usr/local/bin /usr/local/include /usr/local/info /usr/local/lib /usr/local/man /usr/local/share and so on. And, all of this is without having to do any weird mounts (I have g:\cygnus mounted as /) , so anything approaching it would be wonderful; if you simply had to keep it g:\cygnus\cygwin-b, that wouldn't be too bad; we'd just to move everything up one level if we wanted to eliminate it. This also makes our PATHs, GCC_PREFIX, etc. a whole lot shorter . Thanks! Vince - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".