From: hgfernan AT usp DOT br (Hilton Fernandes) Subject: Re: Windows98 + inetutils 29 Sep 1998 05:23:56 -0700 Message-ID: <199809281137.IAA18732.cygnus.gnu-win32@swan2.uspnet.usp.br> References: <36079E63 DOT 444EF684 AT sics DOT se> Reply-To: Hilton Fernandes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: Olle Olsson Cc: Stipe Tolj , gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com, Hilton Fernandes On 22 Sep 98 at 14:56, Olle Olsson wrote: > Being able to mimic an ordinary Unix way of handling users/groups/passwords/... via > "/etc"-files seems like useful approach. The core API functionality remains the same > to a large extent, the difference is only in where things are stored and updated. > > To what extent can one have *one* implementation of the API? What if there are /etc > files on an NT, should these or the NT-owned structures be used. Presumably, as > Windows95 (Windows98?) is weak on security, the NT-way of handling it should be used > on the NT, while on Windows9x the file-based approach is taken. This would enable a > wider portability, something that simplifies management of the system. > > /olle > Hello! Sorry for an empty message. :-( As the great Forrest Gump would say, Shit happens! :-) It's possible that someone that uses MS-Windows 9X isn't particularly afraid of security problems; otherwise, he or she would prefer NT or some other OS. Indeed, any user of a Windows 9X OS is already a priviledged user that can do anything to the system. So, maybe there isn't any additional problem with a non secure access to Windows 9X. Regards, --Hilton ---- Hilton Fernandes hgfernan AT usp DOT br hfernandes AT geocities DOT com http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/5657 URLs and help on C++ programming and Object-Oriented Design - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".