From: newsham AT lava DOT net (Tim Newsham) Subject: fork + dlls 20 Aug 1998 11:55:54 -0700 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Hi, When you manually load a dll, and then perform a fork, the dll is not accessible from the child process. When you think about what is going on here, it makes sense. My question though is, is this the way fork should behave? Or should (could) the fork code reload the dll in the child process after a fork? It seems that this would more closely follow the expected fork semantics. Opinions? Tim N. - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".