From: rrankin AT primenet DOT com (Rick Rankin)
Subject: RE: -mwindows option
6 Jun 1998 22:42:23 -0700
Message-ID: <000001bd91ba$052cab40$9a1e01aa.cygnus.gnu-win32@rankin-isdn-ws2.sat.mot.com>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 980606104906 DOT 23964A-100000 AT modi DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Mumit Khan" <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Cc: <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>

Thanks. I was unaware that this was being addressed.

Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mumit Khan [mailto:khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu]
> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 1998 8:50 AM
> To: Rick Rankin
> Cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: RE: -mwindows option
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Rick Rankin wrote:
>
> > I can certainly deal with that, but at best it seems
> inconsistent IMHO. It
> > seem to the that the compiler driver program (i.e., gcc) should be smart
> > enough to know which options to pass to which phase.
> >
>
> Both -mwindows and -mdll are handled inconsistently, and will be fixed in
> egcs-1.1 (the compile only stage will ignore the options).
>
> Regards,
> Mumit
>

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".