From: EPA AT datcon DOT co DOT uk (Edward Avis) Subject: RE: CygWin32 and Linux 8 May 1998 23:35:32 -0700 Message-ID: To: "'gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com'" >In terms of overlap with Linux, there isn't a lot of potential sharing >that could be happening I don't think. A possible exception is that >we might want to use RPMs for binary distribution of individual >packages. IMHO Cygwin32 would become much more popular if it came complete with source and binary RPMs of things like Perl, X11R6.3, Lesstif, and so on. I don't know if this fits in with Cygnus' product plans, but it seems to me that every Unix-on-NT toolkit around is trying to outdo the others by shipping as many utilities as possible in with the package. Another advantage would be that pristine sources and a well-defined set of diffs for Cygwin32 could replace the current rather chaotic porting of programs. That's not to put down the GNUWin32 package report; it's certainly a useful measure, I just don't think it will scale well to hundreds of packages. -- Ed Avis - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".