From: loki AT dragoncat DOT net (Jeremy Blackman) Subject: Re: Has anyone attempted to port Apache? 1 Sep 1997 18:24:42 -0700 Sender: mail AT cygnus DOT com Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: Original-To: IGnatius T Foobar Original-cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com In-Reply-To: <338259@uncnsrd.mt-kisco.ny.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com On Sat, 30 Aug 1997, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: > Has anyone attempted to port the Apache webserver to the GNU-Win32 > environment? One would assume that it would be a _much_ nicer option than > Micro$oft's IIS. Apache 1.3 has their own official port to WinNT and 95. From what I hear, it compiles and runs rather nicely. Instead of forking off additional services like the UNIX version, I understand that it actually operates as a multithreaded single server process. Their version comes as Microsoft Visual C++ 5.0 projects, however. This means, among other things, that it doesn't need the cygnus winsup DLL to run. It also means to compile the source code, you need MS VC++... Take a look at http://www.apache.org and read up on Apache 1.3... :) +---[ Loki ]------------+---------------------------------------------------+ | Jeremy Blackman | NeonMuck coder/maintainer - Multimedia MU*! | | loki AT maison-otaku DOT net | http://www.maison-otaku.net/neon | +-----------------------+---------------------------------------------------+ - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".