From: masplund AT cs DOT Helsinki DOT FI (aspa) Subject: Re: probs porting ssh 19 Feb 1997 08:57:25 -0800 Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: Reply-To: aspa AT iki DOT fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: masplund AT hydra Original-To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Martin Hamilton wrote: > Am concerned about (wait for it!) the copyright situation, though. I > think I might prefer to start again from scratch with a copy of the > ssh protocol spec and some of the free crypto libraries. What do you > reckon to this aspect ? The lisence that comes with ssh says: .... (c) You may build derived versions of this software under the restrictions stated in Section 2, Restrictions, of this license. The derived versions must be clearly marked as such and must be called by a name other than SSH or F-Secure SSH. SSH and F-Secure SSH are trademarks of SSH Communications Security and Data Fellows. All derived versions of the Program must be made freely available under the terms of this license. SSH Communications Security and Data Fellows must be given the right to use the modified source code in their products without any compensation and without being required to separately name the parties whose modifications are being used. .... but you cannot make money with your port. so if you plan on keeping it free for non-commercial use, then i see no problem with the copyright. another issue is the US export regulations. if the person who ports ssh lives in the US then he might not be allowed to export (for example make it available though ftp) it. -- aspa - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".