From: b DOT backhaus AT bbbo DOT dortmund DOT netsurf DOT de (Bernd Backhaus)
Subject: Re: TeX implementations?
28 Oct 1996 10:53:30 -0800
Sender: daemon AT cygnus DOT com
Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <6JjxZDM-JEB.cygnus.gnu-win32@bbbo.dortmund.netsurf.de>
Reply-To: b DOT backhaus AT dortmund DOT netsurf DOT de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Original-To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
In-Reply-To: <327394A1.1FD7@lamar.colostate.edu>
X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.11 R/C2283
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

murray AT lamar DOT colostate DOT edu wrote 27.10.96 09:58 in <327394A1 DOT 1FD7 AT lamar DOT colostate DOT edu>:


 > Has any work been done on porting an implementation of TeX to the
 > gnu-win32 platform?  If not, I know that EMTeX is written primarily
 > for OS/2, but can be run under DOS and old Win 3.1.  Has anyone had
 > good or bad luck getting it set up and running under NT/95?  I know
 > the DOS implementation involves running some funny memory-management
 > tools.

there is an NT version of BcTeX available at the usual places (got mine from  
the NewT CDROM), but I haven't played much with it yet.


Cheers,
       Bernd.
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bernd Backhaus                        email: b DOT backhaus AT dortmund DOT netsurf DOT de
Brueckstr. 20                    Compuserve: 100111,3061
44787 Bochum                        Fidonet: 2:2448/615.14
Germany
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".