X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Rusty Russell To: Reini Urban Subject: err.h declarations not marked noreturn. Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:11:31 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-24-generic; KDE/4.5.1; i686; ; ) Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <201102011259.53193.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102020911.31282.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:56:44 am Reini Urban wrote: > 2011/2/1 Rusty Russell : > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:41:33 pm Reini Urban wrote: > >> gcc-4.3.4 cygwin ... > > Can you send me (privately) the output of gcc -E on that file? That > > should tell me for sure. A ccan/err module might be a good start. > > Attached. OK, your /usr/include/err.h doesn't have the annotations to tell gcc that it doesn't return. Mine looks like so (Ubuntu): extern void err (int __status, __const char *__format, ...) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__, __format__ (__printf__, 2, 3))); I've CC'd the cygwin list: there might be a good reason why they don't have annotations on their err.h, or it might just be an omission. Thanks, Rusty. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple