X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:54:57 +0200 From: "Vincent R." To: Dave Korn Cc: Subject: Re: gcc4.4 In-Reply-To: <4AA97E23.8090603@gmail.com> References: <898a6abd66f16c3b76e823ecd65fde39@mail.smartmobili.com> <4AA97E23.8090603@gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: forumer@smartmobili.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:30:59 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > Vincent R. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> when will you release a gcc-4.4 package for cygwin ? >> > > Right now I'm concentrating on getting a stable 4.3.4 package out that > will > have all the fixes for all the known problems in 4.3.2 and will be the > first > fully production-ready version. (I've been struggling with the Ada port > which > seems to want to revert to its prehistory and keeps on magically turning > back > into an SJLJ port... weird. Think I finally got it whipped into shape > though.) > Hum I was wondering why you had posted on gcc ML about ada, now I know. > Next on the list after that is sorting out the MinGW cross-compiler, > which > will be based on 4.3.4 stable. > > And then after that..... I'll probably be more inclined to go straight > for > a test version of 4.5.0, and skip over 4.4 series altogether. Is there any reason to ignore 4.4 family ? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple