MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:31:15 +0200
From: "Vincent R." <forumer@smartmobili.com>
To: Andy Koppe <andy.koppe@gmail.com>
Cc: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Optimize cygwin on recent windows version (Vista and Seven)
In-Reply-To: <416096c60906151139n45e0d967n8abee104fe194867@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7c6dcbb9c797277cc8ffb1fc985844af@mail.smartmobili.com> <416096c60906151139n45e0d967n8abee104fe194867@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4af3381770954501a1047738cf928219@mail.smartmobili.com>
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:39:39 +0100, Andy Koppe <andy.koppe@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
>> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
>> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo
>> 3.0
>> Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex)
>> and running windows Seven.
>> Now when I test cygwin, everything is so sloooooowww
> 
> Not exactly a helpful problem report. In what sort of scenarios do you
> find it to be slow? Is it actually slower than your old system?

Easy just try to rebuild a true software( for instance gcc) and you will
have
one year more between the moment you start the build and the moment it's
over.
I am not kidding, if you just "play" with cygwin of course you cannot
notice 
the problem.
If you like I could make some benchmark...


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/