X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:47:05 -0400 From: Cory Cohen Subject: Re: gcc version 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) Internal compiler error In-reply-to: <480A123E.5B756F40@dessent.net> To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: Brian Dessent Message-id: <480A13F9.10103@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <480436C2.8020903@verizon.net> <480A1028.2040202@verizon.net> <480A123E.5B756F40@dessent.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Brian Dessent wrote: > Reporting it to the Cygwin list is the correct place. Don't bother > emailing gcc-bugs or any other gcc list, because a) gcc-bugs is mainly > just for bugzilla-generated traffic and isn't monitored for bugs not > reported through bugzilla, b) gcc 3.4 has not been closed and > unmaintained in years; you'd be directed to try 4.3 or 4.2, and c) our > gcc 3.4 is heavily patched anyway, part of the reason why we don't offer > 4.x yet. > Thanks! I was just getting ready to send another message apologizing and observing that 3.4.4 != 4.3.3. I had no idea that the cygwin gcc port was so old. I just figured that out now while digging for more information. Is there anything else I can do to help then, or should I just wait for the 4.x port? Cory -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/