From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA <matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Cc: matsuoka@nuce.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:18:07 +0900
Subject: Re: Slowness problem due to  sjlj-exceptions for Octave
Reply-To: matsuoka@nuce.nagoya-u.ac.jp
In-Reply-To: <20070906102554.CE896C00.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
References: <46DF4200.54D01692@dessent.net> <20070906102554.CE896C00.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <20070906111807.20B8B110.matsuoka@mol.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Sorry just error correction again
>James R. Phillips, who is a maintainer of octave 2.1.73. Pherhaps he 
>is not working as a maintainer because he has not been made any 
>respose when I threw a topic of  my testing binary of Octave 2.9.12 
>on cygwin.
>
>John W. Eaton, who is a main develper, seems not to like use 
>undefault complier because octave uses the develop category tools 
>including gcc for the advanced user tool. (Function can be complied 
>to specially named dynamic link library *.oct)
>He is afraid that the specially prepared complier confuses the user.
>
>For this reason, James selected the gcc normally prepared.
>At that time, there was no other way to build octave on windows so 
>that even slow binary is meaningful.       

*************************
Please note that the above is mere my speculation.
*************************

Tatsuro MATSUOKA  


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/