Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <42FB89AC.2050801@club-internet.fr> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:23:56 +0200 From: Louis Lecaroz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Louis Lecaroz Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: "Segmentation fault" CygWin tools with code Injection-MS Detours References: <42FB7644.8020905@le-resistant.com> <20050811163305.GB6935@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <42FB7FF2.3020709@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <42FB7FF2.3020709@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes So to be more clear on my previous post (sorry, english is not my natural language :( ) : -The LD_PRELOAD is not performed (It appears not to be performed...) in the forkee, so the code is not loaded in it (I think) -Yes, I would like the LD_PRELOAD to be loaded in the forkee, this will allow also my code to be loaded in the forkee. Finaly I suppose in term of code, not performing a setjmp/longjmp directly to the same CS:IP location in the forkee but to a stub in the cygwin library, loading the LD_PRELOAD & next jumping itself to the same CS:IP as requested in the parent... Am I right ? This question is to be sure, I have understand everything correctly & I have exposed my issue also correctly ;) & also to increase my knowledges on the cygwin code behavior ;) Thx in advance, Louis -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/