Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:46:01 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: "James R. Phillips" Subject: Re: Patch adding *.oct to rebaseall for cygwin Message-ID: <20050711134601.GH3856@tishler.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, "James R. Phillips" References: <20050710030427.38599.qmail@web31505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050711132334.GE3856@tishler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor, On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:35:32AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Jason Tishler wrote: > > rebaseall currently handles .dll files and the next version will > > handle .so files too. I would prefer not to change rebaseall to > > handle non-standard shared library extensions. Instead, can you > > change Cygwin octave to use one of the standard extensions for its > > shared libraries? > > Would adding a command-line option to rebaseall that specifies > non-standard shared library extensions work? That way, Jim could tell > the octave users to run rebaseall with the > "--add-non-standard-dll-suffix .oct" flag, and you won't have to worry > about all the extra extensions for shared libraries out there. Yes, the above is a reasonable approach. I will toss it onto the pile... Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/